Can you elaborate on your experience with state management libraries like NgRx and Akita in Angular applications?

Certainly! Here's a detailed explanation of my experience with state management libraries like NgRx and Akita in Angular applications, including key concepts, use cases, and how I’ve utilized them to manage application state efficiently.

1. Overview of State Management in Angular

State management in Angular is essential for managing the application's state in a consistent and scalable way. In complex applications, where state needs to be shared across multiple components, state management libraries like NgRx and Akita become indispensable. These libraries help in:

Centralizing state management.
Handling side-effects (like HTTP requests).
Ensuring consistent state transitions.
Decoupling the state logic from the component logic.

Both NgRx and Akita are popular in Angular ecosystems for managing application state, but they differ in their approaches.

2. Experience with NgRx in Angular Applications

NgRx is a Redux-inspired state management library for Angular. It uses actions, reducers, and effects to handle the state and side effects in an application.

Key Concepts in NgRx:

Store: Centralized container that holds the application state.
Actions: Plain objects describing an event or user interaction that triggers a state change.
Reducers: Pure functions that specify how the application's state changes in response to actions.
Selectors: Functions used to read state from the store, making it easy to query state.
Effects: Handle side effects (like HTTP requests) and dispatch actions based on asynchronous events.

Setting Up NgRx in an Angular App:

Installation: First, I install the necessary packages for NgRx in an Angular project:
```
bash
ng add @ngrx/store
ng add @ngrx/effects
```

State (Store) Setup: I define a state model and an initial state for the application. For instance, for managing a user state:

typescript
// user.reducer.ts
import { createReducer, on } from '@ngrx/store';
import { setUser, logout } from './user.actions';

export interface UserState {
  user: any;
  loggedIn: boolean;
}

export const initialState: UserState = {
  user: null,
  loggedIn: false
};

export const userReducer = createReducer(
  initialState,
  on(setUser, (state, { user }) => ({
    ...state,
    user,
    loggedIn: true
  })),
  on(logout, state => ({
    ...state,
    user: null,
    loggedIn: false
  }))
);

Actions: I define actions that describe the events (e.g., setting a user or logging out).

typescript
// user.actions.ts
import { createAction, props } from '@ngrx/store';

export const setUser = createAction(
  '[User] Set User',
  props<{ user: any }>()
);

export const logout = createAction('[User] Logout');

Selectors: I create selectors to access specific pieces of state.

typescript
// user.selectors.ts
import { createFeatureSelector, createSelector } from '@ngrx/store';
import { UserState } from './user.reducer';

export const selectUserState = createFeatureSelector<UserState>('user');

export const selectUser = createSelector(
  selectUserState,
  (state: UserState) => state.user
);

Effects (Handling Side Effects): For actions that require side effects (like API calls), I use Effects to handle asynchronous operations.

typescript
// user.effects.ts
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { Actions, ofType } from '@ngrx/effects';
import { Store } from '@ngrx/store';
import { EMPTY } from 'rxjs';
import { map, mergeMap } from 'rxjs/operators';
import { UserService } from './user.service';
import { setUser } from './user.actions';

@Injectable()
export class UserEffects {
  loadUser$ = createEffect(() => this.actions$.pipe(
    ofType('[User] Load User'),
    mergeMap(() => this.userService.getUser()
      .pipe(
        map(user => setUser({ user })),
        catchError(() => EMPTY)
      ))
  ));

  constructor(
    private actions$: Actions,
    private userService: UserService
  ) {}
}

Store Module: Finally, I register the state and effects in the Angular module.

typescript
// app.module.ts
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { StoreModule } from '@ngrx/store';
import { EffectsModule } from '@ngrx/effects';
import { userReducer } from './store/user.reducer';
import { UserEffects } from './store/user.effects';

@NgModule({
  imports: [
    StoreModule.forRoot({ user: userReducer }),
    EffectsModule.forRoot([UserEffects])
  ]
})
export class AppModule {}

Benefits of Using NgRx:

Predictable state management: The state is predictable because it follows a strict pattern of actions and reducers.
Side-effect management: NgRx Effects provide a clean way to manage side effects, such as HTTP calls.
DevTools support: NgRx integrates well with Redux DevTools for time-travel debugging and state inspection.
Scaling: Ideal for large applications with complex state logic and multiple modules.

Drawbacks:

Boilerplate code: NgRx involves a lot of boilerplate code (actions, reducers, effects, selectors), which can make it cumbersome for smaller projects.
Learning curve: The complexity of concepts like stores, effects, and selectors can be overwhelming for beginners.

3. Experience with Akita in Angular Applications

Akita is another state management library for Angular, designed to provide a simpler, more intuitive API compared to NgRx. It focuses on entities and stores, making it particularly useful for applications that need to manage large collections of data.

Key Concepts in Akita:

Store: Holds the state, similar to NgRx, but simpler to set up.
Entity Store: A specialized store for managing collections of entities (like users, products, etc.).
Query: Defines the logic for querying the store and selecting data.
Service: A pattern that interacts with the store and defines actions such as add, update, delete, etc.

Setting Up Akita in an Angular App:

Installation: Install Akita and its dependencies:

bash
npm install @datorama/akita @datorama/akita-ngdevtools

State (Store) Setup: Define a store and a service that handles the state updates.

typescript
// user.store.ts
import { Store, StoreConfig } from '@datorama/akita';

export interface UserState {
  user: any;
  loggedIn: boolean;
}

@StoreConfig({ name: 'user' })
export class UserStore extends Store<UserState> {
  constructor() {
    super({ user: null, loggedIn: false });
  }
}

Query: I create a query to retrieve state data.

typescript
// user.query.ts
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { Query } from '@datorama/akita';
import { UserStore } from './user.store';
import { UserState } from './user.store';

@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class UserQuery extends Query<UserState> {
  constructor(protected store: UserStore) {
    super(store);
  }

  selectUser() {
    return this.select(state => state.user);
  }
}

Service: Define a service that updates the state in response to user actions.

typescript
// user.service.ts
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { UserStore } from './user.store';
import { UserQuery } from './user.query';

@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class UserService {
  constructor(
    private userStore: UserStore,
    private userQuery: UserQuery
  ) {}

  setUser(user: any) {
    this.userStore.update({ user, loggedIn: true });
  }

  logout() {
    this.userStore.update({ user: null, loggedIn: false });
  }
}

Module Setup: I include the store in the Angular module.

typescript
// app.module.ts
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { UserStore } from './store/user.store';
import { UserQuery } from './store/user.query';
import { UserService } from './store/user.service';

@NgModule({
  providers: [UserStore, UserQuery, UserService]
})
export class AppModule {}

Benefits of Using Akita:

Simplicity: Akita has a simpler and more intuitive API compared to NgRx, making it easier to implement and use.
Less Boilerplate: Akita requires less boilerplate code (compared to NgRx’s actions, reducers, and effects), making the codebase cleaner.
Entity Management: Akita shines when managing collections of entities, such as users, products, etc., with features like entity store and CRUD operations out of the box.
Flexibility: While Akita provides a structure, it’s less opinionated than NgRx, giving developers more flexibility in how to organize and manage the state.

Drawbacks:

Lack of widespread adoption: Compared to NgRx, Akita is less commonly used in the Angular ecosystem, which may lead to fewer resources, tutorials, and community support.
Less out-of-the-box tools for complex side-effects: While Akita is simpler, handling side effects (like HTTP requests) isn’t as structured as in NgRx (via Effects).

Conclusion

Both NgRx and Akita offer powerful state management solutions for Angular applications. My experience with NgRx has been in larger, more complex applications where predictability, dev-tools support, and handling complex side-effects were critical. On the other hand, I’ve used Akita in smaller to medium-sized applications or projects where simplicity, reduced boilerplate, and entity management were more important.

NgRx is great for large, complex applications where you need fine-grained control over the state and side effects.
Akita is ideal for simpler applications that need efficient entity management with fewer complexities.

Ultimately, choosing between NgRx and Akita depends on the project’s complexity, team familiarity, and the specific state management needs of the application.

Search This Blog

HappyNewsMan (TechLead Pratap)